Relatives' Distress Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.
“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.
“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.